When AMD introduced the brand new Ryzen Three processors constructed on Zen 2, I used to be underneath the impression that these have been basically the reject components from AMD’s profitable Ryzen 3000 line. Inside is a single chiplet with solely 4 cores energetic out of eight, pushing as much as 4.Three GHz; however the kicker was the low value of $120 for the excessive frequency model, or $99 for a bit slower. AMD has bought quad-core CPUs at $99 for some time, however that is the brand new core and the brand new manufacturing course of, so would this be any completely different? We put them up in opposition to a $350 quad core from three years in the past. It appeared like a loopy thought on the time.
AMD Ryzen 3000 CPUs: Chiplets Go Mainstream
After profitable launches of the Ryzen 9, Ryzen 7, and Ryzen 5 households of Zen 2 {hardware}, AMD has been sitting fairly at north of $200. At every value level, the corporate supplied a compelling choice in opposition to the competitors, as we’ve famous in our critiques of {hardware} just like the 3950X, 3900X, and 3700X. Others, just like the Ryzen 5 3600, are a few of the finest sellers in Amazon’s prime listing. As we famous in our latest CPU patrons’ information, out of the highest 10 spots on Amazon’s finest vendor listing for CPUs, AMD has Eight of them, and the primary 5.
That’s all nicely and good for the upper finish of the market, nonetheless within the sub-$200 class, that is the place the amount typically is. Intel has been neglecting this market of late, because of the abnormally excessive demand for Xeon silicon forcing manufacturing to spend extra time on 28-core {hardware} than quad-core {hardware}. This leaves the door open for AMD, so it was all the time going to be attention-grabbing what the corporate did right here. For a very long time, AMD did nothing, pushing customers to its Ryzen 2000 {hardware} or Ryzen 3000 APUs, specifically as a result of they have been promoting very well (the Ryzen 2600 / 1600 AF presents 6 cores for as little as $85).
With the latest launch of AMD’s newest Ryzen Mobile technology APUs, primarily based on Zen 2 and Vega, we have been uncertain whether or not AMD would fill this sub-$200 hole with desktop variations of these APUs, or provide decrease binned Ryzen 5 3000 components. After a really profitable launch of Ryzen Mobile 4000, resulting in some stellar critiques, it was clear that the cellular silicon was commanding a robust premium available in the market, and so we get Matisse primarily based CPUs coming to the sub-$200 phase as an alternative. With that, on April 21st, AMD introduced its new Ryzen 3 3300X and Ryzen 3 3100 processors.
| AMD ‘Matisse’ Ryzen 3000 Series CPUs | |||||||||||
| AnandTech | Cores Threads |
Base Freq |
Boost Freq |
L2 Cache |
L3 Cache |
PCIe 4.0 |
Chiplets IO+CPU |
TDP | Price (SEP) |
||
| Ryzen 9 | 3950X | 16C | 32T | 3.5 | 4.7 | Eight MB | 64 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+2 | 105W | $749 |
| Ryzen 9 | 3900X | 12C | 24T | 3.8 | 4.6 | 6 MB | 64 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+2 | 105W | $499 |
| Ryzen 9 | 3900 | 12C | 24T | 3.1 | 4.3 | 6 MB | 64 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+2 | 65W | OEM |
| Ryzen 7 | 3800X | 8C | 16T | 3.9 | 4.5 | Four MB | 32 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+1 | 105W | $399 |
| Ryzen 7 | 3700X | 8C | 16T | 3.6 | 4.4 | Four MB | 32 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+1 | 65W | $329 |
| Ryzen 5 | 3600X | 6C | 12T | 3.8 | 4.4 | Three MB | 32 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+1 | 95W | $249 |
| Ryzen 5 | 3600 | 6C | 12T | 3.6 | 4.2 | Three MB | 32 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+1 | 65W | $199 |
| Ryzen 5 | 3500X | 6C | 6T | 3.6 | 4.1 | Three MB | 32 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+1 | 65W | OEM |
| Ryzen 3 | 3300X | 4C | 8T | 3.8 | 4.3 | 2 MB | 16 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+1 | 65W | $120 |
| Ryzen 3 | 3100 | 4C | 8T | 3.6 | 3.9 | 2 MB | 16 MB | 16+4+4 | 1+1 | 65W | $99 |
Filling the underside at value factors of $99 and $120 could be very aggressive. Here is AMD’s newest technology Zen 2 {hardware}, on a 7nm TSMC excessive efficiency manufacturing node, bundled with a 14nm IO die from GlobalFoundries, packaged along with frequencies as much as 4.Three GHz. At the time of…
