Demonstrating the intersection of synthetic intelligence and a reinterpretation of traditional artwork, Delhi University pupil artist Rashi Pandey used generative AI instruments to reimagine Leonardo Da Vinci’s iconic Mona Lisa portray as an Indian girl, replete in conventional Indian apparel. The art work, displayed on social media platform X, exhibits the Mona Lisa in a gown with a dupatta draped over her brow, sporting Indian jewellery, together with a maang tikka, earrings, and an announcement necklace. Pandey’s put up has to this point obtained 1.6 thousand likes and 800 feedback and was shared over 170 occasions.
“I made the Indian model of Mona Lisa utilizing AI,’’ she introduced in her put up. “Give her a reputation.”
Social Media Reacts
Viewers advised names that illustrate the Indian adaption of the Mona Lisa, equivalent to “Shona Lisa,” “Mona Tai,” and “Lisa Ben.” Other feedback imagined how the masterpiece might look in several regional kinds. Some feedback went past the playful.
“To be frank, this is beautiful—more womanly than the original,” one viewer wrote. Sorry artwork connoisseurs, it is a layman’s opinion.” Perhaps impressed by the response, Pandey additionally posted an AI-created Indian model of Queen Elizabeth II on X and requested viewers which they most well-liked.
Will AI Art Kill Creativity?
More than only a enjoyable put up, Pandey’s Indian Mona Lisa speaks to a bigger debate about generative AI and its function in artmaking. AI is comprised of two components: algorithms and knowledge. Artists who create AI-generated artwork say it’s a software or extension of themselves that permits them to develop inventive boundaries as they develop work. Many artists really feel strongly that human involvement and affect are nonetheless important to the inventive course of.
Hugh Leeman, an artist and lecturer who lectures at Johns Hopkins University, Duke University, and Colorado State University, has created a physique of labor, half from his personal creativeness and the opposite half with the assistance of AI.
Leeman believes AI instruments can be utilized “to better our lives,” including that he makes use of them “to create images based on people’s unique lived experiences told in stories embedded with their emotions and memories.” At the identical time, nonetheless, he fears that “the coming generations will likely lose elements of agency of their creativity through the further merging of AI with humans in our social ecosystem as well as our physiology.”
Many artists are additionally involved about AI getting used for plagiarism. Their work is used to coach algorithms, but it surely will also be copied utilizing AI instruments.