eWEEK content material and product suggestions are editorially unbiased. We might become profitable if you click on on hyperlinks to our companions. Learn More.
The trial involving Getty Images and Stability AI started in London on Monday, June 9, 2025. Getty alleges in its lawsuit that the workforce behind Stability AI copied hundreds of thousands of copyrighted photographs with out permissions to coach its AI mannequin.
Stability AI acknowledges the usage of these photographs however argues that it didn’t violate Getty’s trademark rights. In addition, the corporate insists that Getty’s lawsuit poses a menace to the continued improvement of different AI instruments.
Understanding the allegations
Getty Images, a visible media firm, boasts practically 480 million property in its on-line repository of inventory photographs and movies. In the lawsuit, the corporate claims that Stability AI used greater than 12 million of those photographs to coach Stable Diffusion, a generative AI instrument that may create detailed photographs from textual content prompts. Getty alleges that this was finished with out acquiring correct license or consent.
While Getty Images is predicated in Seattle, WA, it’s a world firm with workplaces world wide. Since Stability AI is predicated in London, the present lawsuit is being heard in London’s High Court.
Getty has filed the same lawsuit towards Stability AI within the US, particularly in Delaware. Stability AI can also be among the many firms named in a class-action lawsuit that was filed in California on behalf of quite a few visible artists.
If Getty succeeds, it may safe a courtroom order stopping Stability AI from utilizing any of its copyrighted content material. The firm is looking for financial compensation primarily based on any earnings derived from the alleged misuse of its mental property.
Breaking down the protection
The workforce with Stability AI doesn’t deny utilizing the copyrighted content material with a purpose to practice its generative AI mannequin; the corporate’s legal professionals insist that Getty’s content material is part of the “collective human knowledge,” and due to this fact permits for honest utilization on this method.
A spokesperson for Stability AI was quoted as saying: “The wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas,” and “Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression.”
Fighting for the way forward for AI
Both Getty Images and Stability AI imagine that they’re combating for the way forward for AI. Stability AI argues {that a} ruling in Getty’s favor may considerably hinder the event of next-generation AI programs. But legal professionals with Getty disagree; Getty envisions a future the place AI builders pays for any copyrighted content material they use, whether or not that occurs throughout coaching or in any other case.
