eWEEK content material and product suggestions are editorially unbiased. We could generate income if you click on on hyperlinks to our companions. Learn More.
OpenAI should face a lawsuit from information publication The Intercept alleging the tech big eliminated copyright administration info from articles to coach its AI fashions. A decide defined on Thursday that these actions “implicate(d) the same kind of property-based harms traditionally actionable in copyright.”
Allegations of violating the DMCA and utilizing content material for ChatGPT coaching
In February 2024, The Intercept sued OpenAI for eradicating the copyright administration info from its articles, violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, after which utilizing them as ChatGPT coaching information with out permission. The information outlet additionally alleged that Microsoft, as a major investor, was complicit.
Just a few months later, each tech firms argued the lawsuit must be dismissed as a result of The Intercept didn’t adequately exhibit hurt and AI-generated outputs didn’t depend as reproductions. In November, Judge Jed Rakoff made the choice to dismiss Microsoft from the case and the declare that OpenAI unlawfully distributed articles.
However, the DMCA declare concerning the intentional elimination of copyright info was allowed to proceed, and on Feb. 20, 2025, the decide defined his reasoning behind that call. According to court docket paperwork uploaded by ChatGPT is consuming the world, OpenAI ought to have recognized that eradicating the copyright info could be considered infringement.
He dismissed the declare that OpenAI’s elimination of copyright info from coaching articles led to ChatGPT customers producing “regurgitations” of copyrighted works with out attribution attributable to inadequate proof truly linking the corporate to their distribution. The Intercept additionally didn’t adequately show Microsoft was concerned in any of its accusations.
“The DMCA adds another stick to the bundle of property rights already guaranteed to an author in her work under traditional copyright law,” Judge Rakoff wrote. He added that, regardless of the fashionable utility of the DMCA, the violation produced “the same kind of harm long recognized in copyright suits.”
The determination goes instantly towards the ruling of the same case from Nov. 7, the place Raw Story and AlterNet, two different unbiased information retailers, argued that OpenAI violated the DMCA by eradicating copyright administration info from their articles. In that case, Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the lawsuit, discovering that the plaintiffs didn’t exhibit adequate hurt.
Matt Topic, The Intercept’s lawyer, advised Reuters his regulation agency Loevy + Loevy “look(s) forward to the ultimate vindication of our rights.” An OpenAI spokesperson additionally reinstated that its fashions are “trained on publicly available data, grounded in fair use and related principles that we view as fair for creators, and support innovation.”
Growing issues about journalism and AI firms
How publications can coexist with AI firms continues to be some extent of rivalry within the journalism business. Many retailers have opted to promote their content material to the tech giants to coach their fashions, akin to The Guardian, Associated Press, Reuters, LA Times, The Independent, AFP, News Corp, Financial Times, Time, Conde Nast, and The Atlantic.
There are rising issues that the technique shall be short-lived, and information retailers will in the end battle to outlive if their content material seems in AI summaries as a substitute of producing direct reader visitors to their web sites.
Some retailers are selecting to beat them quite than be part of them, suing the tech giants…
