eWEEK content material and product suggestions are editorially impartial. We might generate profits whenever you click on on hyperlinks to our companions. Learn More.
The Republican-backed “One Big Beautiful” tax invoice features a new provision that may bar US states and localities from regulating synthetic intelligence for the following 10 years. Its sponsors argue that Congress ought to set up a unified nationwide framework to forestall a fragmented patchwork of state legal guidelines.
“AI doesn’t understand state borders, so it is extraordinarily important for the federal government to be the one that sets interstate commerce,” Republican Senator Bernie Moreno mentioned throughout a dialogue of the supply at Capitol Hill, in response to the Associated Press. “You can’t have a patchwork of 50 states.”
The AI provision was launched shortly earlier than the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s markup of the funds reconciliation invoice. Following the committee’s approval, the invoice superior to the complete House of Representatives. It is probably not accepted by the Senate if the addition is deemed to be a coverage matter somewhat than budgetary merchandise, which might violate the Byrd Rule.
The provision’s language applies to “artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems,” overlaying a broad vary of applied sciences from general-purpose chatbots to specialised trade instruments.
Opposition to this AI provision
More than a dozen state attorneys basic despatched a letter to congressional leaders final week opposing the supply. “The impact of such a broad moratorium would be sweeping and wholly destructive of reasonable state efforts to prevent known harms associated with AI,” they wrote.
Over 100 organisations, together with educational establishments and worker coalitions, signed a related letter a couple of days later, saying that “bad tech would be unaccountable to lawmakers and the public” if the invoice have been enacted with the supply.
OpenAI CEO helps a ‘light touch’ federal strategy
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman mentioned {that a} “patchwork” of AI rules “would be quite burdensome and significantly impair our ability to do what we need to do” at a current Senate listening to on AI competitiveness. “I think having one federal approach focused on light touch and even playing field sounds great to me,” he added.
Altman’s remarks mark a shift in tone amongst tech executives, a lot of whom, in 2023, signed a letter warning that AI posed a “society-scale risk” corresponding to pandemics and nuclear battle, and urged international leaders to prioritize mitigation.
Attempts at state-level AI regulation
There have been some notable makes an attempt at state-level AI regulation over the previous few years, however most have met resistance. For occasion, in September 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed SB 1047, which might have been the strongest regulation on generative AI. However, over half of all US states have legal guidelines limiting using deepfakes regarding elections.
Trump administration views AI regulation as an financial impediment
President Donald Trump’s strategy to AI has lengthy favored innovation over regulation. Eliminating compliance measures designed to forestall bias and defend AI shoppers is a part of a broader effort to draw tech corporations that wish to keep away from regulatory delays.
As quickly as he took workplace for the second time, Trump reversed former President Joe Biden’s initiative to offer tips for “protected, safe and…
