Today’s AMD occasion might have been Zen 3’s large reveal, however the firm tossed a juicy bone to the Radeon trustworthy, too. After asserting the beastly Ryzen 9 5900X (amongst others), CEO Lisa Su then confirmed off gameplay footage of Borderlands 3 working on the CPU at 4K decision with an undisclosed Radeon RX 6000-series graphics card. And sure, Internet, AMD’s “Big Navi” goes toe-to-toe even with Nvidia’s brutally quick GeForce RTX 3080.
The mysterious Radeon RX 6000 GPU averaged 61 frames per second even with the sport working on its punishing “Badass” efficiency preset. (Borderlands 3 is an AMD-partnered title.) Su additionally revealed that the Ryzen/Radeon combo hit 88 fps in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (an Nvidia-partnered title) and 73 fps in Gears 5 on Ultra visible presets. AMD plans to announce the Radeon RX 6000-series “Big Navi” graphics playing cards formally on October 28 in a devoted occasion.
In a name earlier than the Zen Three occasion, Radeon chief Scott Herkelman informed me that AMD determined to tease Big Navi’s efficiency as a result of group demand for extra info. It actually was an eye-opening reveal.
AMDThat’s quick.
Hexus examined the $700 GeForce RTX 3080 in Gears 5 and Borderlands 3 utilizing the identical visible presets as AMD did with this Radeon RX 6000 preview, on AMD’s Ryzen 9 3950X. The RTX 3080 hit 59.4fps in Borderlands 3, in comparison with the Radeon RX 6000’s 61fps on this preview. In Gears 5, the RTX 3080 hit 77fps, in comparison with the Radeon RX 6000’s 73fps. The processor makes a distinction, although, as a result of in Eurogamer’s GeForce RTX 3080 evaluation with a Core i9-10900Okay, Nvidia’s card hit 65fps in Borderlands, and 80fps in Gears 5. (The Call of Duty recreation lacks a standardized benchmark, so you may’t evaluate AMD’s outcomes in opposition to different exams, as two wildly totally different scenes might be used.)
That seemingly places AMD’s upcoming card neck-and-neck with Nvidia’s staggeringly highly effective gaming flagship, relying on the processor it’s paired with. That’s damned spectacular—however it’s vital to know what AMD didn’t reveal right this moment, too.
If AMD’s ray tracing answer doesn’t take as a lot on-die area as Nvidia’s, that leaves the Radeon playing cards extra room to cram in conventional rendering {hardware}—shaders, ROPs, geometry pipelines, et cetera. And if AMD can certainly load up Big Navi with extra of that conventional {hardware}—particularly now that CDNA’s arrival means AMD can jettison compute-specific extras from RDNA to focus squarely on gaming—it might certainly doubtlessly deliver a giant combat to Nvidia, and maybe even extra so on the extra widespread resolutions, the place Ampere’s scaling isn’t fairly as potent.
Or possibly not. We received’t know for certain till Radeon RX 6000 graphics playing cards are literally in our arms. These preliminary 4K numbers from AMD look very promising, although.
AMD Radeon Enough recreation idea. You’ve been asking to see how properly Big Navi hangs with Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3080, and AMD delivered Radeon RX 6000 benchmarks right this moment. Big Navi seems to be fairly monstrous, much more succesful than something Radeon has delivered in latest reminiscence, and doubtlessly simply as quick as Nvidia’s new gaming champion. But now that we’ve seen some numbers, we’re left with much more questions than earlier than. One factor is for certain although: Given Nvidia’s ongoing inventory woes with the RTX 3080 and 3090, AMD simply gave annoyed lovers cause to attend and see what Radeon RX 6000 graphics playing cards are able to.
Again, search for the total Radeon RX 6000 reveal on October 28, full with a new-look triple-fan cooling answer.
