The 4900HS posts 11.9% greater CineBench R20 rating (each chips are 8-core/16-thread) when the Intel chip is bolstered with 90 W cTDP, and a whopping 33% quicker when the i9-9980H is at its inventory settings, and 54% quicker when its capped at 35 W cTDP. It additionally finally ends up over 150% quicker than AMD’s final quickest cellular processor, the 12 nm “Picasso” based mostly Ryzen 7 3750H. The story repeats with CineBench R15 (4900H being 34% quicker than inventory i9-9880H), 18% quicker at Handbrake HEVC, 25% quicker at Blender “Classroom,” and 35% quicker at 7-Zip benchmark. The AMD chip lags behind by 12% within the less-parallelized Photoshop. On creativity apps that do scale with cores, similar to Premiere “Warp Stabilizer 4K,” the 4900HS is 12.6% quicker. Gaming efficiency stays an excellent cut up between the 2 chips. Find a number of extra fascinating take a look at outcomes and commentary within the Hardware Unboxed presentation right here. Intel has already introduced a response to the 4900HS within the type of the i9-10980HK.